Is Nathan Carter worth drafting in fantasy football?

Nathan Carter is a running back for the Kansas City Chiefs. Nathan Carter is outside the public top five overall and top five at RB; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.

What team and position does Nathan Carter play?

Nathan Carter is a running back for the Kansas City Chiefs.

← Fanademy

Nathan Carter

RBKansas City ChiefsN.Carter

Updated Sep 23, 2026

Player

Age24May 22, 2002

Height5' 10"

Weight202 lb

CollegeMichigan State

DraftUndrafted2025

33% season miss rate

Fantasy football questions

Is Nathan Carter worth drafting in fantasy football?: Nathan Carter is a running back for the Kansas City Chiefs. Nathan Carter is outside the public top five overall and top five at RB; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.
What team and position does Nathan Carter play?: Nathan Carter is a running back for the Kansas City Chiefs.

What a subscription adds for Nathan Carter

Projected fantasy points, week by week and rest of season
Overall and positional rank, ordered by value over replacement
Value over replacement — points above the last startable player at this position
Dynasty value, adjusted for age
PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring

Start with a free account — checkout in under a minute

No trial. Cancel any time.

Create account to checkout — $5/month or $40/year

An account is free and takes an email address; checkout follows immediately.

Latest

0 articles through Sep 22

Nothing has changed for this player in the recent reporting: no injury, no shift in his role, and no transaction involving him has been reported in the last 30 days. Treat his situation as settled, with the board below reflecting the most recent picture. This note refreshes daily and is replaced as soon as coverage appears.

News timeline

No article we collect names Nathan Carter. Articles are linked by exact full name. If a shared name cannot be resolved to one player who could plausibly appear in current coverage, we do not guess, so this can be a gap in our index rather than a gap in coverage.