Is Damon Bankston worth drafting in fantasy football?

Damon Bankston is a running back for the Green Bay Packers. Damon Bankston is outside the public top five overall and top five at RB; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.

What team and position does Damon Bankston play?

Damon Bankston is a running back for the Green Bay Packers.

← Fanademy

Damon Bankston

RBGreen Bay Packers

Updated Sep 23, 2026

Player

Age23Apr 25, 2003

Height5' 10"

Weight186 lb

CollegeNew Mexico

DraftUndrafted2026

33% season miss rate

Fantasy football questions

Is Damon Bankston worth drafting in fantasy football?: Damon Bankston is a running back for the Green Bay Packers. Damon Bankston is outside the public top five overall and top five at RB; the exact rest-of-season rank and projection are available only on the subscription board.
What team and position does Damon Bankston play?: Damon Bankston is a running back for the Green Bay Packers.

What a subscription adds for Damon Bankston

Projected fantasy points, week by week and rest of season
Overall and positional rank, ordered by value over replacement
Value over replacement — points above the last startable player at this position
Dynasty value, adjusted for age
PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring

Start with a free account — checkout in under a minute

No trial. Cancel any time.

Create account to checkout — $5/month or $40/year

An account is free and takes an email address; checkout follows immediately.

Latest

0 articles through Sep 26

Nothing has changed for this player in the recent reporting: no injury, no shift in his role, and no transaction involving him has been reported in the last 30 days. Treat his situation as settled, with the board below reflecting the most recent picture. This note refreshes daily and is replaced as soon as coverage appears.

News timeline

No article we collect names Damon Bankston. Articles are linked by exact full name. If a shared name cannot be resolved to one player who could plausibly appear in current coverage, we do not guess, so this can be a gap in our index rather than a gap in coverage.